Here’s Everything the Media Won’t Tell You About Nina Jankowicz, Biden’s New Minister of Truth – Orwell’s 1984, 2022 style!
REVOLVER NEWS | April 29, 2022
Just when you thought the Globalist American Empire couldn’t get more Owellian, the Department of Homeland Security is here to make it all worse.
Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas testified Wednesday that the Department of Homeland Security is creating a “Disinformation Governance Board” to combat misinformation ahead of the 2022 midterms. [Fox News]
The timing of the announcement is symbolically fitting, given recent warnings from journalists, NGOs, and prominent Democrat Senators that the prospect of Elon Musk restoring free-speech to twitter constitutes a “danger our democracy.” It is only right then that one of our nation’s largest national security bureaucracies should set up a special “governance board” to address the threat of so-called disinformation that emerges when speech isn’t entirely controlled by the Regime and its proxies.
The DHS has not said much about what the “Disinformation Governance Board” will actually do, but Politico’s brief write-up on the announcement offers some clues:
DHS is standing up a new Disinformation Governance Board to coordinate countering misinformation related to homeland security, focused specifically on irregular migration and Russia. Nina Jankowicz will head the board as executive director. She previously was a disinformation fellow at the Wilson Center, advised the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry as part of the Fulbright Public Policy Fellowship and oversaw Russia and Belarus programs at the National Democratic Institute. [Politico]
In case you’re not up-to-date on Government approved euphemisms, “irregular migration” is the new politically correct term for what used to be called “illegal immigration.” We dare the reader to google “irregular migration” and consult what images pop up. Given that the DHS has become a de-facto full service travel agency for illegal aliens pouring over the border, it makes sense that the same agency would want to label any criticism of its policies as dangerous “disinformation.” That “Russia” also falls under the DHS’ new Ministry of Disinformation’s portfolio is arguably even more ridiculous. Didn’t we just learn that the Hunter Biden laptop story, which dozens of media outlets and former intelligence officials demanded to censor as “Russian disinformation,” turned out to be totally true and legitimate?
The specific choice of the Department of Homeland Security to host this new governance board is telling. In 2020, the Trump DHS released a report claiming that “white supremacy” was the single greatest security threat facing America. Mere months ago, the DHS raised the national threat level on the grounds that “misinformation” about Covid-19 or the 2020 election would drive extremist violence.
Key factors contributing to the current heightened threat environment include:
- The proliferation of false or misleading narratives, which sow discord or undermine public trust in U.S. government institutions:
- For example, there is widespread online proliferation of false or misleading narratives regarding unsubstantiated widespread election fraud and COVID-19. Grievances associated with these themes inspired violent extremist attacks during 2021.
- Malign foreign powers have and continue to amplify these false or misleading narratives in efforts to damage the United States.
But the establishment of the DHS’s Ministry of Disinformation wouldn’t be a proper intelligence community project unless it was absurd as well as dystopian. For the absurdity, we need to look no further than Nina Jankowicz, the disinformation wizard appointed to protect the American people from dangerous speech about illegal immigration and Russia.
So, who exactly is Nina Jankowicz? Certainly, not a person with any concerns about preserving freedom of speech or expression. A quick look at her Twitter history is enough to dispel that. When Facebook permanently banned Donald Trump from its service, Nina was in the wings complaining that this punishment was not harsh enough. Through a metaphor, Nina explained that only mass bans on hundreds or thousands of accounts would be enough to “fix” the disinformation “problem.”
🧵 The Facebook Oversight Board will announce its decision on whether to uphold the platform’s post-January 6 ban on President Trump tomorrow.
— Nina Jankowicz 🇺🇦🇺🇸 (@wiczipedia) May 5, 2021
It will have momentous consequences for political speech around the world. But for countering disinfo, it’s somewhat of a distraction.
A little sapling started growing and by the fall, had grown into quite a plucky, woody weed tree, thriving amidst a bed of poison ivy that Jake, to my dismay, relishes walking through on our morning strolls.
— Nina Jankowicz 🇺🇦🇺🇸 (@wiczipedia) May 5, 2021
(This story has a point, I promise.)
A little sapling started growing and by the fall, had grown into quite a plucky, woody weed tree, thriving amidst a bed of poison ivy that Jake, to my dismay, relishes walking through on our morning strolls.
— Nina Jankowicz 🇺🇦🇺🇸 (@wiczipedia) May 5, 2021
(This story has a point, I promise.)
Needless to say, the next spring, the weed tree came back with a vengeance. The poison ivy got more ropey. And adding insult to injury, the sad little evergreen shrubs they put in got a bag worm infestation. (Do yourself a favor and don’t look up what bag worms are before bed 🤢)
— Nina Jankowicz 🇺🇦🇺🇸 (@wiczipedia) May 5, 2021
….planted and maintained. Gardens don’t just grow; they require upkeep. The same is true of a social network.
— Nina Jankowicz 🇺🇦🇺🇸 (@wiczipedia) May 5, 2021
In this scenario, Trump is the weed tree that is lobbed off on the surface but has a network of roots underground that will keep him (and his rhetoric) coming back.
Jankowicz loves to chastise the peasant masses for thinking they deserve free speech on Big Tech platforms. Didn’t they read the terms of service? Don’t they know this platform is owned by a private corporation?
…when you clicked “I agree” to the Terms of Service.
— Nina Jankowicz 🇺🇦🇺🇸 (@wiczipedia) May 4, 2019
Free speech is not and has never been guaranteed on a private platform. pic.twitter.com/qqjmrx5vtY
But Nina’s blathering about “private platforms” is all fake posturing. In 2019, she loudly demanded that Congress intervene with more restriction and regulation of online speech.
And they are still confusing "more speech" with "free speech." Technology is not an unadulterated societal good that sprinkles people with First Amendment fairy dust at each login. 8/https://t.co/SZtQPJJ7ZG
— Nina Jankowicz 🇺🇦🇺🇸 (@wiczipedia) October 28, 2019
continue reading ….
