BREAKING: Facebook ‘Fact Checker’ Worked At Wuhan Biolab; Ruled Out Virus-Leak While ‘Debunking’ Articles

[EDITOR’S NOTE BY ADINA KUTNICKI: In a “you can’t make this sh*t up” moment in time, along comes the intersection of all intersections, that is, Facebook via its “fact checkers” (in itself, an oxymoron) are in bed with  those who helped to spread the pandemic of our times, the CHINESE WUHAN VIRUS! This is akin to fire chiefs vouching for arsonists, or chiefs of police backing-up the “testimony” of stone-cold murder suspects! No kidding. In any case, having co-written the book of all books on Facebook, it is not an exaggeration to state that blowing smoke in these eyes re Facebook’s red-green agenda is a fool’s errand, that’s putting it mildly. So, knowing more than most about Facebook’s underbelly, well, the fact that one of its “fact checkers” worked at the infamous WUHAN lab which unleashed – yes, it did – the pandemic of our times, the issue isn’t how could this happen, rather, it is: How many more are out there with the same bonafides — or lack thereof — promoting false information which, in no small measure, will end up aiding and abetting in countless deaths across the globe? That’s the long and short of it.]

FREEDOMNEWSUSA.com April 16, 2020

A Facebook fact checker who has ‘debunked’ articles suggesting that COVID-19 may have leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) has a giant conflict of interest; she worked at the institute – which is now suspected of accidentally leaking the hyper-virulent virus which has killed over 130,000 people and cast the global economy into chaos.

Danielle Anderson, who works at Duke University’s NUS Medical School lab in Singapore, also contributes to Science Feedback – which Facebook has been using to slap “False Information” labels on articles claiming that COVID-19 may have originated at the Wuhan institute – where Anderson worked with bat coronavirus.

A quick search of Anderson’s publications reveals no fewer than nine collaborations with Dr. Peng Zhou – a Wuhan scientist experimenting on bat coronavirus (the mention of whom may result in a Twitter ban).

Sharyl Attkisson
ProudMamaBear @ProudMamaBear17
Replying to @SharylAttkisson

I got my warning for sharing.

View image on Twitter
 
 
Anderson has been adamant that the lab adheres to the highest standards of safety, and that COVID-19 simply couldn’t have accidentally been leaked by her colleagues.

“I have worked in this exact laboratory at various times for the past 2 years. I can personally attest to the strict control and containment measures implemented while working there,” Anderson writes in one such ‘debunking’ of a New York Post article that claims “China [is having] a problem keeping dangerous pathogens in test tubes where they belong” while Science Feedback cast doubt on the Post‘s claim that “evidence points to SARS-CoV-2 research being carried out at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”

Except, they were carrying out SARS-CoV-2 research at that exact lab, according to new reports in the Wall Street Journal, the Daily Mail and Fox News.

An April 9 report in the Journal reveals that COVID-19 is genetically identical to a coronavirus found in a horseshoe bat “collected by hazmat-clad scientists from the Institute of Virology in Wuhan.”

While a Wednesday report from Fox News reveals that COVID-19 leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and that “patient zero” was an employee who became infected before spreading it throughout the community, according to ‘multiple sources who have been briefed on the details.’

And while Anderson was busy covering for her corona-labmates with Facebook debunkings implicating the WIV, she went on national television to explain that the virus could have only come from outside the lab.

 

America's Civil War Rising

America's Civil War Rising (ACWR) is a grassroots educational and public benefits organization. All views and opinions expressed by third-party contributors and authors that are posted and contained on our website herein are solely their own and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of ACWR, its founding members, volunteers, and/or supporters. ACWR strives to ensure the accuracy and credibility of all news and information but makes no claim as to the veracity or accuracy of any of the views or opinions expressed by third-party authors herein.

Sign Up for Daily Email Notifications of Our Posts

Email Address *

ORDER OUR BOOKS

READ OUR BOOK REVIEWSAND ORDER YOUR COPIES NOW!