‘Media Promotes 25th Amendment Scenario Following Trump COVID Diagnosis + Seriously? Look Who The Moderator For The Next Debate Used To Work For In College’ – THE POISON/TOXIN WITHIN: THE DEM-STATE MEDIA COMPLEX, THE FIX IS IN! [VIDEO EVIDENCE]

BREITBART | By Joshua Klein | October 2, 2020

Scores of popular twitter users, including many media personalities and pundits, posted tweets on Friday citing the 25th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which provides for a process for removing a president who is “unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office.” 

Fox Business reporter Susan Li noted that “#Google searches on the #25thAmendment SURGED up! after the news broke”:

MSNBC analyst David Corn was quick to invoke the amendment:

CNN Chief International Anchor Christiane Amanpour tweeted that constitutional law expert Deborah Pearlstein says the 25th amendment provides for a scenario of President Trump’s diagnosis worsening:

USA TODAY justice and legal affairs reporter Kristine Phillips said, “It’s too soon to talk about the president’s demise, but it’s not too soon to talk about the 25th Amendment. Trump’s symptoms could get worse and could affect his thinking.”:

Author Michael Beschloss also referenced the amendment:

CBS-affiliated WUSA9 tweeted that “the 25th Amendment helps accommodate for situations” when a president gets “too sick”:

Senior Executive Editor of Bloomberg Opinion David Shipley tweeted a “crash course on the 25th Amendment” from Cass Sunstein, who was in the Justice Department when Reagan was shot: 

Despite associating the implementation of the 25th Amendment with the President’s COVID diagnosis, opponents have discussed invoking the amendment to oust him from the presidency on frequent occasion since his election.

♦  ♦  ♦  ♦  ♦

TEA PARTY | October 2, 2020

The word “objectivity” really doesn’t seem to mean much at all to the Democratic Party and the various folks in the left-wing media who constantly lean to the left and push an agenda that transforms them more into propaganda machines than anything else.

Nowhere is this seen more clearly than the folks who keep getting picked to moderate presidential debates. First, we had Chris Wallace, a host for Fox News, who has made it very clear he hates President Trump. During the entire first event, Wallace more or less inserted himself into the conversation and made himself a second debate opponent for Trump. It was insulting.

Surely they wouldn’t repeat a similar mistake for the next debate, right?

Wrong.

The next moderator, Steve Scully, an editor for C-SPAN, actually used to intern for Joe Biden back when he was in college. I’m sure he’ll bring some objectivity to things, right?

Via BizPacReview:

Scully, now-60, reportedly worked as an intern in then-Sen. Joe Biden’s mailroom for six weeks from September to October 1978. The following spring, he reportedly worked as an intern in then-Sen. Ed Kennedy’s office.

According to some, this connection alone makes Scully an inappropriate choice for moderator, particularly in light of moderator Chris Wallace’s biased, one-sided performance during the first presidential debate this past Tuesday.

Among those who feel this way is Sen. Ted Cruz.

“Everyone agrees Tuesday’s debate was a train wreck. A major contributing fact was the moderator Chris Wallace, a registered Democrat, repeatedly interrupting to try to help Joe Biden,” he tweeted Tuesday.

“The next debate is set to be moderated by a former intern to…Joe Biden. This is NUTS. And no Republican should allow this bias to continue in future elections.”

Look:

However, the internship factoid is one of many that suggest Scully may not be the optimal choice. While it’s true that his internship with Biden happened 42 years ago, a photo posted by him just four years ago shows him attending a Biden “beach bash.”

But there’s more. That same year, he posted a David Brooks column to Twitter bluntly titled, “No, Not Trump, Not Ever.”

Combined, these factoids unequivocally disqualify Scully for the job of moderating the next presidential debate, according to critics.

The last debate moderator Chris Wallace was a totally biased partisan who kept rescuing Biden. The next debate moderator is C-SPAN’s Steve Scully, who once worked in Joe Biden’s office, before working for Ted Kennedy. Could the debate committee be less obvious? #debate

This guy most definitely should not be moderating this debate. He’s obviously biased against the president and because of that, there’s no way he’ll be able to remain impartial. Wallace wasn’t able to, so what would make this guy any different?

Remember how ridiculous it seemed for Joe Rogan to offer to moderate a debate? Honestly, at this point, he looks like the best available choice. What do we need to do in order to make that happen?

Tags

America's Civil War Rising

America's Civil War Rising (ACWR) is a grassroots educational and public benefits organization. All views and opinions expressed by third-party contributors and authors that are posted and contained on our website herein are solely their own and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of ACWR, its founding members, volunteers, and/or supporters. ACWR strives to ensure the accuracy and credibility of all news and information but makes no claim as to the veracity or accuracy of any of the views or opinions expressed by third-party authors herein.

Donate with PayPalSupport Our Vital Work

Sign Up for Daily Email Notifications of Our Posts

Email Address *

Legal Policies

Eyes on Terror

ORDER OUR BOOKS

By Nancy Hartevelt KobrinLOOK INSIDE
By Nancy Hartevelt KobrinLOOK INSIDE
By Nancy Hartevelt KobrinLOOK INSIDE
By Nancy Hartevelt KobrinLOOK INSIDE
Nancy Hartevelt KobrinLOOK INSIDE
READ OUR BOOK REVIEWSAND ORDER YOUR COPIES NOW!

Authors

Recommended Sites