Slick Willie Tribunal Delayed Over “Compromised” Panelist

By Adina Kutnicki

EVEN until the very bitter end, there are those whose over-blown egos, absolute sense of entitlement, and out-sized smugness can only be viewed as the ultimate in pathological narcissism. One needn’t be a mental health professional to arrive at said rational “diagnosis.” Sheesh.

SUCH is especially the case when it comes to the tippy-top of the deep state spear, that is, in tandem with their violent “dispatchers.” Hench-people. Indeed, it kinda makes sense. After all, if one gets away with a lifetime of  “mysterious” assassinations — ala so-called suicides — yes, feeling invincible becomes a foregone conclusion. Modus operandi.

BODYCOUNT killed by the Clinton machine. MEDIA BLACKOUT IN AMERICA –

The Clinton Chronicles – The Bill Clinton Murders

ADINA KUTNICKI’s (Abbreviated) CHARGE SHEET:

AND, another thing: click on the 6:54 marker (or thereabouts) and listen up to the most clued-in, well-informed, high-flying aeronautics pro; a (former) special ops guy…you decide….

ALAS, the following preliminary report re the run-up to Slick Willie’s Military Tribunal at GITMO is hardly shocking. Not at all.

IN fact, with a lifetime of sick and highly twisted criminal behavior exhibited by the former POTUS, could it end up any other way?? Asked and answered. Rhetorical, too.

♦  ♦  ♦  ♦  ♦

REAL RAW NEWSBy Michael Baxter | June 15, 2021

On Monday afternoon William Jefferson Clinton, dressed in a white jumpsuit and handcuffs, swaggered into GITMO’s south courtroom, and flashed a smile at the three-officer commission tasked with judging the Judge Advocate General’s case against him. In what can be described only as a surreal scenario, one panelist, a female Air Force captain, returned the smile and told Clinton “It’s a pleasure to finally meet you, Mr. President.”

Vice Adm. John G. Hannink, present to prosecute JAG’s case, looked at the officer—who we will call Captain Ashley Redding—in stunned silence. He then reprimanded her, asking why she had breached protocol by engaging the defendant in civil discourse.

Captain Redding looked at both Vice Adm. Hannink and the other two panelists with a furtive grin. Her face reddened, and she admitted she was once Clinton’s fan and had voted for him twice.

“I can’t help it. People love me,” Bill Clinton said.

Vice Adm. Hannink ordered Clinton’s MP escort to drag him back to his cell, then cleared the courtroom except for Captain Redding. He asked whether her warm greeting to Clinton was facetious or sarcastic, and she confessed that she had developed a fondness for Clinton long before she had joined the Armed Forces.

As with all commission volunteers, Cpt. Redding had been vigorously vetted prior to selection. She was one of 350 officers who had volunteered to judge the military’s evidence against Bill Clinton without bias, passion, or prejudice. In fact, JAG officials spent several hours interviewing her to ensure she could impartially adjudicate evidence.

Cpt. Redding told Vice Adm. Hannink that she had lied on a questionnaire and had deceived interviewers who had asked if she had personal feelings for Clinton, one way or another. She said her “childhood crush” would not hamper her sagacity to deliver fair judgment.

“I simply got lost in the moment at seeing him,” she told Vice Adm. Hannink. “I’d wanted to meet him all my life. But that won’t effect my ability to judge him fairly.”

Vice Adm. Hannink was not impressed. “You betrayed your oath to the U.S. military and to this court. You are dismissed and consider yourself lucky we won’t seek punitive action against you.”

He said that William Jefferson Clinton’s tribunal would begin in a few days, after he and JAG had correctly vetted a third member of the commission.

Adina Kutnicki

Adina Kutnicki

America's Civil War Rising (ACWR) is a grassroots educational and public benefits organization. All views and opinions expressed by third-party contributors and authors that are posted and contained on our website herein are solely their own and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of ACWR, its founding members, volunteers, and/or supporters. ACWR strives to ensure the accuracy and credibility of all news and information but makes no claim as to the veracity or accuracy of any of the views or opinions expressed by third-party authors herein.

Sign Up for Daily Email Notifications of Our Posts

Email Address *

ORDER OUR BOOKS

READ OUR BOOK REVIEWSAND ORDER YOUR COPIES NOW!