- “Abrahamic Dialogue” Is submission to Islam Faruqi’s modern application of Islamic religious doctrine to “Abrahamic dialogue” has engendered a supremacist, jihadist and anti-Israel “interfaith” dialogue. - 08/02/2019
- ANDY BOSTOM: TED CRUZ SACRIFICED CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES WITHIN WEEK OF IRAN NUKE DEAL……. - 01/23/2016
- ANDREW BOSTOM: ALL THE PERFUMES OF EURABIA WON’T SWEETEN THE SHARIA STENCH OF COLOGNE…….. - 01/22/2016
Why “Regime Change” Won’t Solve the Iran Nuclear Weapons Problem in ~ 150 Words
(See explanation in full, at PJ Media, HERE)
The key figures in the (Soylent) Green Movement, both eternal spiritual inspiration Ayatollah Montazeri (d. 2009), and active, remaining political leader Mousavi, not only share the modern Shiite Weltanschauung of jihadism, Anti-Westernism, Jew- and broader najis-inspired infidel hatred, they supported (deceased Ayatollah Montazeri)/ support (living political leader Mousavi) Iran’s nuke program. Mousavi even made that support part of his 2009 Presidential campaign.
Add these facts to the additional facts that 83% of Iranian remain Sharia supremacists, and 63% wanted nukes at the very height of the economic sanctions regime, and one must ask what significant anti-nuke program, anti-Sharia program is going to be accomplished by “regime change” within this “leadership,” and popular sentiments milieu? The answer is all too obvious to any but the delusive, or willfully ignorant: none. Certainly none worth delaying the requisite military strikes to destroy Iran’s nuke facilities to the greatest extent possible.
All Articles Copyright © 2007-2015 Dr. Andrew Bostom | All Rights Reserved
Printing is allowed for personal use only | Commercial usage(For Profit) is a copyright violation and written permission must be granted first.
Source: Why “Regime Change” Won’t Solve the Iran Nuclear Weapons Problem in ~ 150 Words
